Incriminating Google searches

[Zuul]

So what are some searches that might look bad if somebody was looking through your history?

This series of searches might lead to prison time:

Where can I get animal tranquilizers?
"giant inflatable dildo"
How to dissolve a body with lye?

[Revs]

I tried finding some maps of US missle silos a few weeks ago. I also was browsing some firearm websites at the same time too. Not enough to get me into trouble, but the combination may raise a few eyebrows.

[Jeff]

Nude young girls
Local teaching jobs
how to install a surveillence camera

[Zuul]

Well, at least you weren't trying to find out how to build homemade bombs?

The searches I mentioned above have all occurred on this computer, however not at the same time and they weren't related. The first one was because I was questioning the accuracy of a TV show, the second because I was curious about an art project I was interested in, and the third because I needed the method for a short story.

Edit: This was a response to TFR.

[Revs]

Well, at least you weren't trying to find out how to build homemade bombs?

Nah, that knowledge was acquired a long time ago.

[Taumpy]

My Google searches are apparently incredibly boring. The only thing people would look sideways at is "christian porn". There's a ridiculously bad book out there described with that exact phrase by its Amazon review that one friend of mine got for another on her birthday (she's a huge prude, but it wasn't a joke gift, he was completely serious in thinking she'd like it) and I couldn't remember the name.

I have no idea what actual christian porn would look like. And I really have no interest in finding out.

[PapSett]

LOL... i have actually thought about this before. I am working on a novel, and in my research, I have looked up some awfully suspicious stuff...

- drug trafficking in Columbia
- quickie divorce
- fake passports
- sex shows in Tiajuana

Among other things!

[Hatshepsut]

1. untraceable poison
2. inheritance laws
3. profit!

[AllWalker]

The problem is, I enjoy the casual study of human sexuality. Especially things that make you scratch your head and think, "Really?" So that explains search terms like climacophilia. But some other gems:

cocaine laos
cunt-sama
lion king sex
nigerian spam email
sexy hippo
trix rabbit porn

But half of the searches seem to be related to chemicals. None of them are "OMG heroin precursor" chemicals, but most of them are "OMG please don't drop this in the water supply" chemicals.

[Claptree]

My google history now contain all the searches above. Curse my curiosity!

[OneCentStamp]

women who like men with small penises

[Zuul]

These aren't all related, but they could all be seen as the product of a diseased mind. Also, most of these were inspired by conversations in chat:

Calvin and Hobbes rule #34

cake farts

Biblical slash Pharaoh/Moses

cannibalism "white meat" "red meat"

[OneCentStamp]

Biblical slash Pharaoh/Moses

I knew that whole story about the staff turning into a snake was metaphorical!

[Jaglavak]

I have no idea what actual christian porn would look like.

It's the location of the halo.

[Revs]

Calvin and Hobbes rule #34

That's just plain wrong Zuul.

[tunaman]

heh. Not too long ago, I remotely accessed a client's computer to fix a problem with the Windows Installer. The owner of the computer is a gay man, but you wouldn't know it because he's extremely conservative (in the "Old Southern Money" sense). I was therefore surprised when I started typing "settings for Windows Installer" into the Google search box to see "sex with a wet dry vac" pop up as a previous search.

As someone who has done low-level IT work for 12 years, you might be surprised (or not) by not only how often users look at porn at work, but by how the type of porn changes with income level\position. Average Joes on the factory floor only seem to look at bigjugs.com, while people with "chief" in their title tend to go for weird shit like spanking-thai-amputee-twinks.com.

[AllWalker]

Bah, that's nothing. By that scale I should be the chief of chiefs by the end of next year.