I was at the supermarket today, and had a little time in the checkout line to look around. Normally I try to avoid looking at the candy display, because, well, I don't really need candy. (Now if only I could use that same will power to avoid the soda aisle.) But I was intrigued to see a new packaging style I'd not noticed before: Wrigley's new 5 flavors of chewing gum.
I'll admit that the packaging caught my eye, and it had been a while since I'd had some gum, so I looked a bit closer, to see what flavors were available.
Cobalt, Rain, Flare, Elixer and Lush.
Just in case you don't believe me, here's the website, with the gums displayed and their flavors labeled. Obviously, I've not been paying too much attention to gum, if these were rolled out in 2007 and 2008, but still - I expect flavors to actually be something that I can taste.
Besides, who's going to willing choose to ingest something labeled Cobalt, anyways? It's not a toxin, but I'm most familiar with Co-60, which isn't exactly healthy food, either. Rain? I've actually drunk some rain water. Bleh. Aeration is the best thing for cold water. Flare, this one I can actually guess is a cinnamon flavor, but given that it's linked to bleh, and a toxin, I'm still not willing to try it. Then we get to Lush. I know what a lush is. A lush is a polite term for the guy you stepped over in the gutter with his half empty Colt 45 bottle next to him. I don't want to taste him, dammit. Smelling him was bad enough.
And Elixer. *sigh* Elixer is a wonderful word that means almost anything. But it's got nothing to do with flavor. If I were to name something as having the flavor of Elixer it would be a cola-flavored something, because Coca-Cola is my Elixer of Life. But I doubt that's what they were going for.
What's wrong with simply labeling the flavor?


Reply with quote
