Originally posted by Julie
Imagine you're a cop and you're taking a statement from a witness about an event. Imagine the witness says, "And then the silence was cut, like a switchblade through a piece of silk."
You're a cop, remember. What information did that witness just give you?
Now imagine you're a cop and you're taking a statement form a witness about an event. Imagine the witness says, "There was a noise. It sounded weird, like a squealing pig on a trampoline."
The first simile feels very vague and formless. The second is weird, but very specific. You can imagine the sound rising and falling, or the squealing mixed with the springs of the trampoline, or the sound being jolted at regular intervals. You can ask more specific questions to hone in on the precise meaning.
Most of the time, poetry benefits from being specific rather than general, concrete rather than abstract, and conveying information rather than vague ideas. Most of the time. There are exceptions aplenty.
Here's an idea, which you can use if you like: As an exercise, you can try writing your poem from the point of view of a witness giving a statement. Think of very specific, very concrete ways you can set the scene, giving information and mood to the cop. Include what seems relevant to the statement. It's a regular person talking, so you don't need any legalese. You can even mix in questions from the cop if you like.