Okay...this will be the sole source of tunes for you...forever!
:madsci:
Pick now, and enjoy the bananas, coconuts and salt water.
Printable View
Okay...this will be the sole source of tunes for you...forever!
:madsci:
Pick now, and enjoy the bananas, coconuts and salt water.
And Sarah, I don't even want to hear about it. This is valid research, expertly executed.
The Stones, easily. The Stones released a ton more music than the Beatles, and while not all of it was great, there's no rule that says I have to listen to the bad stuff. So I'll listen to Sticky Fingers and Exile, while playing frisbee with Steel Wheels.
I loves me some Steel Wheels.
OK. Here, catch! ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Oliveloaf
That was easy...Beatles all the way. Can I get solo stuff in the package?
No! :Shake:Quote:
Originally posted by Sarahfeena
An interesting Steel Wheels note:Quote:
Originally posted by OneCentStamp
I have seen in old architecture that turning wheel pattern from the cover of the album.
It's actually reproduced on some of the trim on the Harold Washington Library in Chicago.
This was so simple for me, Beatles without a doubt or moment's hesitation.
Beatles. And honestly, I would rather chose Hall & Oates than the Stones. I know it's an unpopular opinion, but I really have no use for most of their work. (I like "Can't Always Get What You Want" and uhh... "Paint It Black", I guess).
Let's say yes.Quote:
Originally posted by Sarahfeena
The Stones have some solo stuff, too.
While the Stones are more rocking and put out more material, I had to go with the Beatles simply for the overall better quality of their music and the variety contained within the records.
I would like to use young Tom's answer as my own.Quote:
Originally posted by Taumpy
♪ Priii-iiii-vate eyes - they're watching you (clap clap!), they see your every move...♫
It's too easy. Beatles FTW.