If movies and television are to be believed you can go to Las Vegas or Reno and get married almost immediately. Are there any such places in Europe?
If movies and television are to be believed you can go to Las Vegas or Reno and get married almost immediately. Are there any such places in Europe?
I can't speak to Europe, but I just wanted to pop in and say that movies and television are indeed to be believed in this case. It's completely possible to go to Vegas or Reno and get married in an hour or two.
"You laugh at me because I'm different; I laugh at you because I'm on nitrous."
find me at Goodreads
I think Gretna Green in Scotland fits the OP. Wikipedia says:
In common law, Gretna Green marriage came to mean, in general, a marriage transacted in a jurisdiction that was not the residence of the parties being married, to avoid restrictions or procedures imposed by the parties' home jurisdiction.[2] Other towns in which quick, often surreptitious marriages could be obtained came to be known as "Gretna Greens".[3] These have included Elkton, Maryland,[4] Reno and, later, Las Vegas, Nevada, all in the United States. A notable Gretna marriage was the second marriage in 1826 of Edward Gibbon Wakefield to the young heiress Ellen Turner, the Shrigley abduction.
Les sanglots longs des violons de l'automne blessent mon coeur
D'une langueur Monotone
Not anymore, if that article is to be believed. Would have been kind of a drag anyway. Instead of going to Vegas to get a blingy marriage and gamble away the honeymoon fund, you go to a rainy Scottish village?Originally posted by CRSP
Helllllls yeah. I'd much rather go to Scotland than Vegas.Originally posted by Harlequin
I was going to say Greta Green only because it's mentioned in Pride and Predjudice as a place to get a quickie wedding. Sadly, that's the extent of my learnings on this subject.
everything in nature is sort of gross when you look at it too closely. what is an apple? basically the uterus of a tree - terrifel
What about somewhere like Monte Carlo? Is there a correlation between gambling and getting married?
Isn't Denmark pretty popular for quickie weddings?
No Gods, No Masters
This is something that, as a Nevada native, I never quite got. Everybody I know had to go to the courthouse and wait in line for hours to get their marriage license first. Sure, it can be done in a day, but it's not that fast. Is there an express lane for out-of-towners?Originally posted by OneCentStamp
So now they are just dirt-covered English people in fur pelts with credit cards.
% Oh, it's a nice day for a whim wedding %
Well, wiki says that the main thing is non-requirement of a waiting period or blood tests. I'd assume the length of time spent sitting in the courthouse would depend on the location you went to. I still don't understand why anyone would actually want to do it, though. Who needs to elope in this day and age?Originally posted by Caerie
Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit.
Return of Blümchen! (To my Avatar spot.)
Last.fm Pandora Political Compass
Mentes Liberae et Mercatūs Liberi
No clue. I don't see why anyone would want to hurry to go through a life-changing event like that.Originally posted by Vox Imperatoris
And now I'll stop hijacking this thread with my tangent!
So now they are just dirt-covered English people in fur pelts with credit cards.
This thread's made me realize just how 'quickie' the Japanese system is. Both parties need to have their family registers on hand, but if they have that then marriage is simply a matter of filling in a form at the town hall - no more than an hour or so. No blood tests, no waiting periods, no counseling. There are some complications for marrying a foreigner, since I had to get an affidavit from the US embassy that I wasn't married to anyone else (the family register fulfills this role for Japanese citizens), but that's also only takes an hour or so (depending how far you are from the embassy).
If both parties are amenable to separation and there are no kids, divorces work the same way.
No cage, thank you. I'm a human being.
I had no idea, but apparently it is. It seems that it's still a couple-of-days-deal at best. I'm looking for a real spur-of-the-moment kind of thing. I'll try to cut out the too-many-hyphens-shtick.Originally posted by alphaboi
(bolding mine)Originally posted by Vox Imperatoris
:shock: :? :?:
I didn't make the world this way, it was like this when I got here
America, land the of the free, home of the "sometimes you have to have a physical exam before you can get married."Originally posted by TheFlame
It actually doesn't look like Nevada is all that special for a "quickie wedding" in America anymore, though.
So now they are just dirt-covered English people in fur pelts with credit cards.
For STDs, particularly syphilis. The laws, where they still exist (my own state has no waiting period and no blood tests, so it's just as "quickie" as anywhere else), were originally passed in the 30s, when people were still very concerned about syphilis, and they were intended to keep these diseases from being passed from parents to children (not to mention that it was slightly more reasonable in that era to suspect that the people getting married had not yet had sex with each other, so it could work for that, too). Most states no longer require them.Originally posted by TheFlame
Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit.
Return of Blümchen! (To my Avatar spot.)
Last.fm Pandora Political Compass
Mentes Liberae et Mercatūs Liberi
I believe that you can get a quickie in Albania - read this in one of my travel magazines. Hold on, let me go find a cite.
Here it takes 4 months but in Northern Ireland it's way quicker, might only be a day or two.
Originally posted by Myrnalene
As I recall the marriages there were performed by the village blacksmith for some reason.
In British literature it was always the place where young couples who didn't have their parents approval eloped to rather then a place for "whim" marriages.
Thirty minutes of Googling not only doesn't make you an expert in a subject,it doesn't even make you right.Real life experience and education will win out every single time
[quote="lust4life...As I recall the marriages there were performed by the village blacksmith for some reason...[/quote]
I think Scots law only required (requires :?: ) that the bride & groom declare themselves married in front of witnesses. A cleryperson isn't strictly needed.
No Gods, No Masters
Agh. I was just reading about this tradition, and I can't remember where. Something about anvil being strong?Originally posted by lust4life
Ah, now I remember! It was on the Colonial Williamsburg website. It was in a slideshow about colonial courtship practices. It just says, "The anvil confers strength to bonds forged above it," which sounds all pretty and everything and hell, who knows? Maybe they're just blowing smoke up your ass. But there's a longer tradition of making contracts over anvils in Great Britain. In medieval law, it wasn't necessary to have a contract drawn up in legalese by a lawyer. A verbal agreement was just as binding, and was more binding if you had witnesses, so if somebody reneged, you could take them to court and have witnesses to back you up. What does the blacksmith's shop have going for it? It's public! More witnesses. The anvil is also a powerful symbol of strength and durability. There are lots and lots of references to anvils and hammers as very hard things, sort of the embodiment of strength. William Marshall's father famously (maybe apocryphally) replied when King Stephen threatened to hang William that he had the hammer and anvil to make more sons. There's also this whole slew of saints that were supposedly martyred when some person in power commanded their arms and legs to be broken with an anvil and hammer. So, don't mess with anvils.
Anyway, the reason Scottish law is different from English law is that Scotland retained some legal rights after incorporating (I'm not sure what word to use there; Wikipedia says "joined in political union") with England, so marriage laws made in England didn't necessarily apply in Scotland. That a clergy member or other legally certified person was not required to be present to join a couple in marriage is something that dates back to (pre)medieval times. The church and government didn't insert themselves into the marriage ceremony until it became obvious that they had a vested interest in what was going on. It wasn't until The Council of Trent in the 16th century that marriages without a Catholic priest present weren't recognized by the Church, and the Protestant churches shortly made similar rulings. Prior to that, the Church was just for registering and blessing marriages (which was optional), and all that a couple needed to do was agree that they were married, with or without witnesses or a ceremony. Witnesses just increased the likelihood of other people recognizing your union, and decreased the likelihood of your spouse taking you to court when you broke your marriage vows.
Is that all clear as mud?