But the lineups! How to look at it? How about this: the Dodgers will field a clearly, markedly better offensive player than the D-backs at first base (James Loney over Chad Tracy, even if Loney doesn't rebound from 2008), second base (Orlando Hudson over Felipe Lopez), catcher (Russell Martin over Chris Snyder), and left field (Manny over Conor Jackson).
At best, the D-backs may be able to get equal production out of center (Matt Kemp vs. Chris Young) and third base (Casey Blake vs. Mark Reynolds), but that's assuming Reynolds improves a lot, Blake gets worse, and Young becomes about 50% better while Kemp stagnates (none of which are good assumptions, really). The only places on the field where I'd give the D-backs an edge are short, where Drew might put it all together this year and hit 30 home runs (but it's not like the Dodgers are going to throw out Rey Ordonez at short, either) and right, where Upton is potentially, but not currently, better than Andre Ethier. So if things break a certain way, the Dodgers could be better at every single spot in the lineup - plus, the D-backs have no one as game-breaking as Ramirez, and the one guy who could be (Justin Upton) is only 20 years old.