Laitz touts his new book with some helpful examples at the piano. Pretty good -- for once somebody says something not stupid about analysis on youtube. People think analysis has something to do with their completely incorrect misconceptions of what it means to use a formal language as a tool of thought. It's the same error cultural critics make when they try to talk about Anglo-Austro-American philosophy which is, since you asked, the primary place where research is performed in neuroscience, mathematical logic, knowledge representation, machine learning, and ontologies in computer science.
Namely, a bunch of gibberish.
Thinking is simple. Notation is merely a helpful tool. Vertical analysis, Laitz stresses, is so limited and ineptly practiced that it is not just the wrong approach, but it is worse than wrong.