+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Should Billy the Kid be pardoned

  1. #1
    Administrator CatInASuit's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Coulsdon Cat Basket
    Posts
    10,342

    Default Should Billy the Kid be pardoned

    Bill Richardson, the current Governor of New Mexico, has said he will decide whether to pardon Billy the Kid before he leaves office.

    On the one hand, he was a thief and a murderer. On the other, he was promised a pardon if he testified in a trial resulting from the Lincoln County War. According to the deposition, he was locked up in jail and reminded the then governor about their agreement. When nothing was forthcoming he broke out of jail killing two guards in the process.

    Considering that several of his criminal actions took place after his testimony, does he deserve a pardon?
    In the land of the blind, the one-arm man is king.

  2. #2
    Elen síla lumenn' omentielvo What Exit?'s avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Central NJ (near Bree)
    Posts
    10,071

    Default

    Not really in my opinion but then we are talking about little more than a publicity stunt at think point and I guess I don't really care.

  3. #3
    Aged Turtle Wizard Clothahump's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    475

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by CatInASuit View post
    On the other, he was promised a pardon if he testified in a trial resulting from the Lincoln County War. According to the deposition, he was locked up in jail and reminded the then governor about their agreement. When nothing was forthcoming he broke out of jail killing two guards in the process.

    Considering that several of his criminal actions took place after his testimony, does he deserve a pardon?
    In other words, he did not honor his agreement.

    No pardon.
    Last edited by Clothahump; 25 Dec 2010 at 02:39 PM. Reason: fixed tag
    Political correctness will be the death of our country.

  4. #4
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    While I think it's pointless either way, I agree with Clothahump. After he escaped he went on to commit a number of other crimes, including murder.
    So now they are just dirt-covered English people in fur pelts with credit cards.

  5. #5
    Member
    Registered
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    97

    Default

    rape, murder, arson, and rape.

  6. #6
    A Groupie Marsilia's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,988

    Default

    Exactly why would a governor pardon someone who's been dead roughly 130 years? It really does come off like a publicity stunt of some kind.
    So, I'll whisper in the dark, hoping you'll hear me.

  7. #7
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by hobbler View post
    rape, murder, arson, and rape.
    All committed against the same victim!
    So now they are just dirt-covered English people in fur pelts with credit cards.

  8. #8
    Curmudgeon OtakuLoki's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    I don't really think he should be pardoned. Even if the government did reneg on a pardon agreement, he committed sufficient crimes after that, that I don't see any merit to the idea.

    Quote Originally posted by Marsilia View post
    Exactly why would a governor pardon someone who's been dead roughly 130 years? It really does come off like a publicity stunt of some kind.
    Sure it's a publicity stunt. And it's one that would play well for Nevada's tourism industry: If you're using a historical figure in your advertising, even a well-known household name, some people are going to look askance at you if that person is a unmitigated murderer. If however, he's a pardoned murderer, things look a lot better for using his name in one's advertising.

    That, at least, has a pragmatic reason I can understand. There are pushes from a number of people to exonerate their ancestors for military courts martial verdicts. In at least one case, dating back to the War of 1812*. I usually have more sympathy for such people, but I also have to wonder whether the result would be worth the cost in time and effort.


    *The case of William Sitgreaves Cox.

  9. #9
    Member Elendil's Heir's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The North Coast
    Posts
    24,320

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by OtakuLoki View post
    ...Sure it's a publicity stunt. And it's one that would play well for Nevada's tourism industry....
    Nitpick: New Mexico.

    Agreed it's a publicity stunt; Gov. Richardson is even inviting public comment as to whether or not he'll issue the pardon. If I were him, I wouldn't do it - BTK's crimes were notorious and frequent; let him continue to be rightly condemned by history.

  10. #10
    Curmudgeon OtakuLoki's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by Elendil's Heir View post
    Quote Originally posted by OtakuLoki View post
    ...Sure it's a publicity stunt. And it's one that would play well for Nevada's tourism industry....
    Nitpick: New Mexico.

    d'oh

  11. #11
    Member Elendil's Heir's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The North Coast
    Posts
    24,320

  12. #12
    Oliphaunt Rube E. Tewesday's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    7,743

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by Elendil's Heir View post
    But who's going to break the news to him?

+ Reply to thread

Posting rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts