+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Experimental drug to prevent lesbianism

  1. #1
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default Experimental drug to prevent lesbianism

    Blog about it here.

    There are a bunch of issues with this one. Aside from the fact that the drug probably isn't doing any good for the intersex condition it's supposed to treat (by the time they know to prescribe it, there's probably already genital ambiguity in the fetus anyway), side-effects include low birth weight, central nervous system effects, cleft palate, liver enlargement, a decrease in fetal beta cells and other negative outcomes in animals.

    And then of course...preventing lesbianism? Really?

  2. #2
    Oliphaunt jali's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2009
    Location
    NYer in Atlanta
    Posts
    3,464

    Default

    This is scary shit!

    There are so many fatal illnesses that need additional research, and money was spent so that this crap is here today.

    Bullshit! Bull Shit.

    We're going back to the 50s with this type of medicine - what's next, a reapplication of shock treatment to "cure" homosexuality?

    Shit.
    They weren't singing....they were just honking.
    Glee 2009

  3. #3
    Banned
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by Dr. New's propaganda
    Dr. New maintains contact with all children treated prenatally, and has found not permanent adverse effects of treatment on mother or fetus. Thus, with nearly 20 years’ experience, the treatment has been found safe for mother and child.
    Quote Originally posted by Other endocrinologists
    Prenatal use of the drug is associated with low birth weight, central nervous system effects, cleft palate, liver enlargement, a decrease in fetal beta cells and other negative outcomes in animals.
    But, whatevs, as long as it stops her from licking box, right?

    This is fucking outrageous. This woman is a menace and the parents who would consent to this are sick.

  4. #4
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by Exy View post
    ...and the parents who would consent to this are sick.
    In my experience, people can be absolute morons when it comes to their kids and doctors. Not all people, but a disturbing number of them. If a charismatic doctor comes along and tells them she can prevent abnormalities (the intersex condition, which she can't) and if she doesn't do this they might never, ever have grandbabies (except intersexed people and lesbians, when fertile, will often have kids), a lot of people aren't going to ask questions. They'll just do what the doctor tells them to do, without even fully realizing that it's a choice. The Dr. New story is just the modern twist on Dr. Money, who also never had a shortage of parents letting him experiment on their children in pursuit of "normal."

    Since there appears to be a critical period in brain development when things like gender identity and sexual orientation are laid down, throwing drugs at fetuses willy nilly isn't going to even fix the problem it's supposed to be fixing and anybody with a grasp of medicine who's aware of the research should know it. This isn't just unethical and horrifying, but bad science verging on voodoo.

  5. #5
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    Oh, wait. Reading further I see that I was wrong about how they're admnistering it:

    Quote Originally posted by Hilde Lindemann, Ellen K. Feder, and Alice Dreger
    Because the steroid is given before the sex of the fetus can be known, and because only some of the fetuses will have CAH, 87.5 percent of the pregnant women started on dexamethasone for this use are not even carrying an affected child. (In fact, half of the fetuses started on the treatment will be males.) They will not receive the treatment past the point at which their fetuses’ sex and CAH-status are accurately diagnosed; nonetheless, for a period of fetal development (including, obviously, brain development), almost 90 percent of those fetuses are being given a steroid that might harm them and can do them no good whatsoever.
    [Bolding mine.]

  6. #6
    I've had better days, but I don't care! hatesfreedom's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    I can't wait till we start editing out the genes that cause people to be gay. It's gonna be fabulous.

  7. #7
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    Most likely such genes don't exist, hates, but it'd be safer doing it that way than denying otherwise ordinary little boys the androgens they need to develop out of the fear that maybe, just maybe, a lesbian might be gestating.

  8. #8
    I've had better days, but I don't care! hatesfreedom's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    I had always assumed being gay was genetic like pretty much every other thing a human is. Infact I still do.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by Zuul View post
    Oh, wait. Reading further I see that I was wrong about how they're admnistering it:



    [Bolding mine.]
    Wait, they're administering testosterone-blocking drugs to males as well? Thus, it would seem, increasing the chances a boy will be born with underdeveloped genitalia or hypospadias or ambiguous genitalia.

    This is horrifying.

  10. #10
    Free Exy Cluricaun's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Elgin IL
    Posts
    3,641

    Default

    Speaking as someone who is an experimental drug to treat lesbianism himself, this is sick, wrong, and should be made as illegal as possible right now.
    Hell, if I didn't do things just because they made me feel a bit ridiculous, I wouldn't have much of a social life. - Santo Rugger.

  11. #11
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by Exy View post
    Wait, they're administering testosterone-blocking drugs to males as well? Thus, it would seem, increasing the chances a boy will be born with underdeveloped genitalia or hypospadias or ambiguous genitalia.

    This is horrifying.
    Yes, exactly. Close to 90% of these pregnancies don't involve a female fetus affected with CAH. Statistically 50% of these pregnancies won't involve a female at all.

    For the sake of preventing intersex conditions in 12.5% of these fetuses you're potentially causing intersex conditions in 50% of these fetuses. The math, it hurts.

  12. #12
    Curmudgeon OtakuLoki's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    The math is bad enough, but currently the understanding for just how the various endocrine balances interact to affect fetal development is crude, at best.

    My understanding is that a lot of seemingly unrelated development within the fetus is actually affected, and sometimes regulated, by the so-called sexual hormones. There is literally no way to be certain, at this time, what sort of developmental botches are being encouraged by this treatment.

  13. #13
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by OtakuLoki View post
    My understanding is that a lot of seemingly unrelated development within the fetus is actually affected, and sometimes regulated, by the so-called sexual hormones. There is literally no way to be certain, at this time, what sort of developmental botches are being encouraged by this treatment.
    While there are side-effects associated with this particular drug, the lack of androgens alone during a brief period may not cause that many problems for the XX fetuses. I'm not saying they won't, but just that a female fetus can probably handle a brief period without them, due to what we know from androgen insensitivity.

    Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) prevents an XY fetus from utilizing androgens and what results is an externally female child with testes hidden in the abdomen and a shallow vagina. Puberty happens a bit later than in XX individuals, but the testosterone the undescended testes produce is converted into estradiol (since the body can't use it as testosterone due to the CAIS), causing breast formation. The lack of menstruation, acne or body hair that are typical with puberty are the only external indications that anything unusual is happening. So if a fetus is developing ovaries and a uterus anyway and will later on be capable of utilizing androgens (and there's nothing to indicate she won't be) that part of things is less likely to cause problems.

    However, the XY fetuses are missing out on androgens for a short period of time. They need those to develop male structures. They aren't denied for the full pregnancy, meaning that they won't be born appearing female, but they very likely could have micropenis or malformed gonads or their brains might be feminized.

  14. #14
    Elen síla lumenn' omentielvo What Exit?'s avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Central NJ (near Bree)
    Posts
    10,071

    Default

    Experimental drugs and fetuses should pretty much never be brought together unless the fetus has some kind of clear problem. To do this as a preventative measure does sound if not criminal then monstrous at least.

    Quote Originally posted by Zuul View post
    ... or their brains might be feminized.
    What does this part mean?

  15. #15
    The Queen Zuul's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9,908

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by What Exit? View post
    What does this part mean?
    Right now, we don't know what all of the ramifications of brain feminization in an XY individual might be. Different degrees of it have been associated with homosexuality and identification as a female (such as in the cases of those with CAIS, who typically identify as straight women, even more often than XX individuals), but we've only been able to identify a correlative relationship. This is all big, scary new territory and not a place to be experimenting on babies.

  16. #16
    DeWitt Hoser 5er's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    DeWitt, MI
    Posts
    281

    Default

    It's not a place to be experimenting on anyone.

    I feel like crying.

  17. #17
    Sophmoric Existentialist
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    777

    Default

    What am I missing here? I read the blog linked to in the first post and I guess I failed to "get it". How can anyone know what hormones a foetus is exposed to? Like, is this just, you know, "Hey, don't wanna take a chance on a lesbian baby? Let us give you hormones!" ?????? Is that what this is? What the HELL? What the HELL? Jesus H. Christ.

    Do they do tests on the foetus to see if it's XX or XY, or what?

    Someone explain this to me. It's so vile and ghastly I am almost foaming at the mouth here.
    Last edited by vison; 01 Jul 2010 at 11:37 PM.
    Sophmoric Existentialist

  18. #18
    Curmudgeon OtakuLoki's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    vison this is just my quickie understanding, and I may be mistaken. What they're talking about are fetuses that have been found to have a genetic predisposition towards something called CAH. This condition may affect the formation of genitalia, and be related to other ambiguous sex-related traits. It's a bit more detailed than finding out XX vs XY. It's also ignoring that there are many, many factors that affect how a fetus develops, and that genes, alone, don't determine everything.

    The testing can find the predisposition to CAH, as I understand it. It can't tell, until after the treatment has been in progress for some time, whether the specific fetus is actually showing signs of irregular development.

    ETA: It is ghastly and vile, and I think foaming at the mouth is a healthy reaction to this atrocity, BTW.
    Last edited by OtakuLoki; 01 Jul 2010 at 11:58 PM.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Registered
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    Quote Originally posted by vison View post
    Do they do tests on the foetus to see if it's XX or XY, or what?
    At least according to what Zuul quoted, they're administering it before it's possible to determine the baby's sex, so half the affected fetuses are male.

+ Reply to thread

Posting rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts